What we’re up against.

Saturday, October 9th, 2010 @ 12:09 am | Deficit, Economy, Politics

Some Republicans are claiming they’d be open to defense cuts, but how far will they go? Bruce Bartlett tackles the usual wingers like Bill Kristol who have come out against defense cuts:

Defense Secretary Robert Gates, originally appointed to his position by George W. Bush, has taken the lead on finding $100 billion in savings over the next five years. But the magnitude of our budgetary problems requires much deeper cuts. And as a recent Congressional Budget Office briefing makes clear, deep cuts are impossible without scaling back our defense commitments.

As the painful process of deficit reduction moves forward next year, many conservatives are going to scream that our national security is being fatally undermined. They will need to be reminded that excessive national debt also undermines our national security — especially when much of it is owned by foreigners like the Chinese. As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recently warned:

Our rising debt level poses a national security threat, and it poses a national security threat in two ways. It undermines our capacity to act in our own interests and it does constrain us where constraint may be undesirable. And it also sends a message of weakness internationally … It is very troubling to me that we are losing the ability not only to chart our own destiny, but to have the leverage that comes from this enormously effective economic engine that has powered American values and interests over so many years.

Is it good strategy to mortgage the earnings of future generations to keep a widespread standing army in 2010? To go broke maintaining a Cold War-fighting machine in a guerrilla war?

Anyway, go read the whole article. Reading an actual conservative take down the radical posers of the GOP is too sweet.


4 Responses to “What we’re up against.”

  1. Dana Says:

    You should have quoted another part of the article you cited:

    To their credit, many of the tea party candidates likely to be elected to Congress next month have made clear that Pentagon spending will be on the chopping block. Politico’s John Bresnahan recently quoted Tea Party Patriots leader Mark Meckler saying, “Everything is on the table. I have yet to hear anyone say, ‘We can’t touch defense spending,’ or any other issue … Any tea partier who says something else lacks integrity.”

  2. Henry Whistler Says:

    You should have read my first line, Dana. How far will they be willing to go?

  3. Descent Says:

    Dana sounds like a lot of typical boomers, they get everything they want and still complain about not getting enough.

  4. Henry Whistler Says:

    Yeah. I mean, I like the boomers as people, mostly. Their arc through history is some pretty weighty stuff. At the same time, there’s this big fat bill waiting for us. Their culture of greed has left us with big bills for big services yet no desire to pay for them.

    And we’re the ones who get to work to support them the next three decades. Yay.